Work ability follows from good management – Correct information is needed for everyday management

The management of work ability plays a key role in every modern organization – it is central to constructing and maintaining a thriving work community.  According to Tiina Loikkanen and Johanna Kivimäki, senior consultants at Terveystalo, we cannot expect people alone to change during major transitions.

“It is increasingly important for managers and leaders to understand that we must fix organizations and develop work itself to meet the needs of future workplaces,” says Loikkanen.

To achieve proactive development of work, the management of work ability should be made an inherent part of companies’ strategic and daily management. In this way, it would no longer be the responsibility of individual employees, as is often the case at present. However, the good will of responsible companies often does not turn into appropriate action until management has access to enough information about the real state of well-being at work.

“To date, we have not had enough tools or versatile indicators to support comprehensive management. Even if supervisors manage work ability perfectly, the impact of their good work is not visible to management,” Kivimäki points out. 

Work ability management is present in daily work

Kivimäki emphasizes the significance of a systematic and transparent process to effective work ability management. Work ability management is part of day-to-day management and leadership, and its impact can be seen in the improved well-being of employees at work.

“Work ability management is, essentially, part of project management. For it to be successful, it must be planned carefully and carried out determinedly. It is also important to assess the impact of the actions taken and to engage in continuous improvement,” says Kivimäki.

“Work ability management should be made transparent. Data are refined into forecasts, and Terveystalo’s tool makes the impact of activities visible to supervisors, HR, and management,” Loikkanen adds.

Are the indicators adequate?

Companies and organizations now have better insight into the importance of work ability management and monitor a wide range of related indicators. However, indicators such as sickness absence rates reflect past actions. It would be important to consider whether data are collected solely on past phenomena or whether management is truly proactive. In addition to conducting risk assessment, it would be useful to monitor factors that maintain the ability to work. Such data are obtained from personnel surveys, for instance.

According to Loikkanen and Kivimäki, setting requirements is also a form of caring. By encouraging employees to actively talk about their work, we can promote small actions that, in the big picture, influence the company’s eNPS, employee engagement, and even sickness absences.